test1/library

Repo commit activitydanger

The repository recorded zero commits and zero active maintainers in the last three months, consistent with the package's long release gap. No provided maintenance signal offsets this lack of recent activity.

Maintainerscaution

A single registry maintainer provides a thin publishing base, which increases continuity risk for a package with no recent release or commit activity. This is only supporting evidence because registry access does not prove who actively maintains the project.

Package scaffoldingcaution

The package has no README, which is a documentation gap for a library consumers must integrate. The absence of tests and a changelog in the artifact is normal packaging practice, while the repository does contain a test file.

Release historycaution

The package has had only one release, published about six years ago, with no releases in the last 12 months. That is strong evidence of abandonment risk, although the release is stable and not deprecated.

Repo package mentioncaution

The repository name does not match the package name, and no README mention was collected, so the linkage is less transparent. A monorepo subpackage could explain the name difference, but the available evidence does not establish that.