The MIT license, README, tests, and changelog provide solid transparency for consumers. Its workflow uses two unpinned actions and the repository has no security policy or scanning, so maintenance hygiene is weaker than the release cadence suggests.
74%
Total Score
67
100
94
75
There were no commits and no active maintainers in the three months before collection. Recent releases partly compensate, but the lack of source activity is a meaningful maintenance warning.
There were no new or closed issues or pull requests in the last month, with two issues and one pull request still open; this is consistent with limited recent project interaction.
Composer and Robo provide build tooling, but no security scanning tools are configured, leaving a modest repository hygiene gap.
The repository has no security policy. This does not establish a vulnerability, but it reduces transparency about how security reports are handled.
The single workflow was fully analyzed with no dangerous triggers, untrusted checkouts, script injections, or audit findings. However, both of its two action references are unpinned, which weakens build reproducibility.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
techdivision/import-product Version ^26.3 | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.