It has clear documentation, tests, and a matching MIT license, with no install-time scripts or deprecation. Its small, single-user project and unpinned workflow actions add modest long-term and build-integrity concerns.
67%
Total Score
50
100
67
There were no commits and no active maintainers in the three months before collection. This is the clearest maintenance concern, despite the relatively recent repository push and release.
The repository has no security policy. For a validation library this is a transparency and issue-reporting gap, though it is less severe than a missing license or abandoned repository.
The sole workflow was fully analyzed with no dangerous triggers, untrusted checkouts, script injection, or audit findings. However, both action references are unpinned, which leaves the build exposed to upstream action changes.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
illuminate/support Version ^11.0|^12.0 | — | — |
illuminate/validation Version ^11.0|^12.0 | — | — |
tavo1987/ec-validador-cedula-ruc Version ^2.0.1 | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.