Consumer documentation, tests, and basic project structure are in place. However, maintenance appears to have stopped, and the repository lacks security scanning and a security policy, making long-term dependency risk significant.
43%
Total Score
50
100
81
88
The source repository is owned by an individual account rather than an organization, and no stronger project backing is shown. Combined with the absence of recent activity, this leaves limited visible maintenance capacity.
This is the only release, published nearly 5 years ago, with no releases in the last 12 months. The lack of release activity is a meaningful maintenance concern, although the package is not deprecated.
There were zero commits and zero active maintainers in the last 3 months, consistent with the repository having stopped changing nearly 5 years ago. This materially raises abandonment risk.
Composer build tooling is present, but no security scanning tools were detected. That weakens ongoing maintenance and vulnerability-detection transparency.
The linked repository is not archived, but it was last pushed nearly 5 years ago. The unarchived status is positive, while the old push date reinforces the maintenance concern.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
google/protobuf Version ^3.3 | — | — |
alibabacloud/tea Version ^3.1 | — | — |
alibabacloud/tea-utils Version ^0.2 | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.