Its documentation and licensing are clear, and the repository matches the package. Pinning workflow actions would improve build reproducibility, while recent contributions from two maintainers support continued care.
80%
Total Score
100
100
50
The repository has no security policy, leaving vulnerability-reporting expectations undocumented. This is a transparency gap, but it is not evidence of abandonment or unsafe behavior by itself.
All three workflows were analyzed without failed files, and there were no untrusted checkouts, script injections, or high-confidence audit findings. However, all nine action references are unpinned, which weakens build reproducibility.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
No maintainer information available.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
slevomat/coding-standard Version ^8.0 | — | — |
wp-coding-standards/wpcs Version 3.4.1 as 2.3.0 | — | — |
squizlabs/php_codesniffer Version ^3.8 | — | — |
automattic/phpcs-neutron-ruleset Version ^3.4 | — | — |
sirbrillig/phpcs-variable-analysis Version ^2.0.1 | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.