Tests, a changelog, and a focused dependency set support maintainability. The workflow also has low-confidence cache findings and no security scanning, so pinning a specific release does not remove the maintenance burden.
42%
Total Score
0
100
79
50
The package has had no release in more than five years; all 15 releases occurred by July 2021. That long publishing gap is strong evidence of abandonment risk.
The repository recorded zero commits and zero active maintainers in the last three months, consistent with the repository's last push being in July 2021. This materially lowers confidence in ongoing maintenance.
The repository has zero stars, forks, and watchers. Popularity is only supporting evidence, but these counters provide no external indication of an active user or contributor community.
The repository has no security policy and no documented security scanning tools. This is a transparency and maintenance gap for a package intended to be integrated into applications.
All 7 of 7 analyzed action references are unpinned, which weakens build reproducibility. The three cache-poisoning findings are low-confidence hygiene warnings, so they add caution rather than proving a severe workflow risk.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
No maintainer information available.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
sylius/sylius Version ^1.7 | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.