sweetchuck/robo-sass
The package includes a useful README, tests, and a declared GPL license, making it reasonably transparent. Install-time scripts, no recent commit activity, and no security policy add maintenance and change-control concerns.
58%
Total Score
50
71
50
Health Score Breakdown
The latest release was published in November 2019, with no releases in the last 12 months and only three releases overall. This substantially raises staleness risk for a dependency, even though the package is not registry-deprecated.
The package defines post-install and post-update scripts, which increase installation-time behavior and change-control exposure compared with a package without lifecycle hooks.
There were zero commits and zero active maintainers in the last three months. This is a concrete maintenance concern, although the recent repository push and existing tests provide limited compensating evidence.
The repository uses Composer and Robo for builds, but no security-scanning tool was detected. This is a modest transparency and maintenance gap rather than a severe risk.
The repository has no security policy, leaving vulnerability reporting and response expectations unspecified. This lowers project transparency but does not by itself make the release unfit.
Vulnerabilities
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
Package versions
Maintainers
No maintainer information available.
Direct Dependencies
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
 consolidation/robo Version ^1.0 | — | — |
webmozart/path-util Version ^2.3 | — | — |
Weekly Downloads
Info
- Last Published
- 6 years ago
- Created
- 9 years ago
Are You Affected?
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.
I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001CompliantISO 42001Compliant
FedRAMPImplementing© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.