Documentation is only a brief placeholder, and the repository has no tests or security policy. Organization ownership and a valid BSD license provide useful transparency, but not enough to offset the long abandonment risk.
32%
Total Score
50
67
50
The package has had only two releases, both in August 2016, with no release in nearly 10 years. This strongly indicates abandonment risk.
The repository recorded zero commits and zero active maintainers in the last three months, consistent with its last push in August 2016. No newer maintenance evidence compensates for this.
A README exists but is only an 87-character placeholder saying documentation is forthcoming; the absence of tests and a changelog is normal for published artifacts and is not itself a gap.
The repository name matches the package, reducing identity concern, but the README does not mention the package and provides almost no consumer guidance.
The repository has no security policy, leaving vulnerability-reporting expectations unclear. This is an additional transparency gap for a dependency that has otherwise seen no maintenance.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
nette/di Version ~2.3 | — | — |
nette/utils Version ~2.3 | — | — |
nextras/orm Version ~2.0 | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.