The MIT license, tests, and practical README make the package transparent and easy to evaluate. Its lack of a security policy and minimal repository adoption provide little additional support for long-term maintenance.
45%
Total Score
0
67
50
The package has only one release, published nearly seven years ago, with no releases in the last 12 months. This is strong evidence of abandonment risk, although the package is not marked deprecated.
The repository recorded zero commits and zero active maintainers in the last three months, consistent with its last push occurring nearly seven years ago. No newer maintenance evidence compensates for this gap.
The repository has zero stars and zero forks, with one watcher. Popularity is only supporting evidence, but these low adoption indicators provide little external evidence of active maintenance or review.
The repository uses Composer build tooling, but no security scanning tools were detected. The missing scanning is a maintenance-hygiene gap rather than a severe risk, especially for this small and inactive project.
No security policy was found in the repository. This reduces transparency about vulnerability reporting and support expectations, with no provided evidence of a replacement process.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
nette/di Version ^3.0 | — | — |
nesbot/carbon Version ^2.0 | — | — |
surda/themeable-controls Version ^1.0 | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.