The README, MIT declaration, release notes, and lack of install-time scripts provide useful transparency. Two contributors made four commits in the last three months, but the project has no security policy or security scanning. Its small release history leaves long-term maintenance uncertain.
68%
Total Score
67
100
83
83
The repository is owned by a user account rather than an organization, so the small contributor base and concentrated activity provide limited visible maintenance backing.
This is a young package with one release, first published 73 days ago, so there is little evidence of sustained maintenance or release stability.
Two contributors are active, but one accounts for 75% of recent commits, leaving maintenance somewhat concentrated in a small project.
The repository has zero stars, forks, and watchers. This is supporting evidence of limited adoption, though the package is only 73 days old and popularity is not decisive.
Composer build tooling is present, but no security scanning tools were detected, leaving a meaningful project-maintenance safeguard gap.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
monolog/monolog Version ^2.0|^3.0 | — | — |
guzzlehttp/guzzle Version ^7.0 | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.