Its small runtime dependency set and stable versioning reduce adoption friction. The project remains current, but transparency and operational safeguards are limited.
66%
Total Score
67
100
79
50
The published artifact has no README, while the repository does contain tests. The tests support project maturity, but the missing consumer-facing documentation is a real transparency gap for a library.
The repository is owned by a user account rather than an organization. This provides no organizational handoff capacity to offset the concentrated contributor activity.
All 4 recent commits came from one contributor, giving the project a complete single-person bus factor. No organization backing is shown to compensate for that concentration.
The repository name does not match the package name, and no README package mention was found. Although this may be a subpackage naming difference, the collected evidence leaves package-to-repository ownership less transparent.
The repository uses Composer build tooling but reports no security-scanning tools. The missing scanning is a modest operational gap, not evidence of abandonment by itself.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
No direct dependencies.
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.