Documentation and licensing are in place, with a small dependency set and a matching source repository. Treat it as legacy code and verify payment behavior before relying on it in production.
38%
Total Score
25
100
67
75
The package has had only two releases, both in October 2015, and none in the last 12 months. That long release gap is a substantial abandonment concern for a payment integration.
The repository recorded zero commits and zero active maintainers in the last three months, consistent with activity having stopped years ago. This leaves defects and dependency changes unlikely to be addressed.
The registry lists one maintainer, and the project backing identifies an individual-owned repository rather than an organization. A single-person maintenance base increases continuity risk, especially alongside the long inactivity.
The repository has one star and no forks, indicating very limited adoption. Popularity is supporting evidence only, but it offers little external maintenance or review confidence here.
Composer build tooling is present, but no security scanning tools were detected. For a payment library, that is a meaningful hygiene gap, though it is secondary to the lack of maintenance activity.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
phpseclib/phpseclib Version ^2.0 | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.