struct/data-type

Registry deprecationdanger

Packagist marks the entire package as abandoned and names data-type/contracts as its replacement. This is a direct adoption risk that outweighs the otherwise recent release activity.

Package scaffoldingcaution

The artifact has no README, tests, or changelog, while the repository also reports no tests or changelog. Missing tests and changelog are normal packaging gaps here, but the missing README reduces consumer transparency for a library.

Repo package mentioncaution

The repository name does not match the package name, and no README mention was found. This may reflect a sub-package repository, but the package-to-source relationship is not clearly established.

Repo popularitycaution

The repository has zero stars and forks and one watcher. Popularity is only supporting evidence, but these numbers provide little external evidence of project maturity.

Security policycaution

The linked repository has no security policy. This is a transparency and maintenance gap, though it is less significant than the package-level abandonment flag.