The clear MIT declaration and absence of install-time scripts reduce adoption friction. Its 50-day history, missing consumer README, and unverifiable source make long-term maintenance harder to judge.
58%
Total Score
50
80
100
Seven runtime dependencies and no development dependencies indicate a meaningful dependency surface for a small library. The profile is not inherently unsafe, but it gives less evidence about testing and development practices.
The published library has no README, tests, or changelog. Missing tests and changelog are normal for a published artifact, but the absent README makes integration harder for consumers.
The package is only 50 days old, with 15 releases and a median interval of about 21 hours. The active early cadence is encouraging, but the short history leaves limited evidence of sustained maintenance.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
No maintainer information available.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
exception/unexpected Version ^1.0.0 | — | — |
standard-library/asn Version ^1.0.38 | — | — |
standard-library/x509 Version ^1.0.38 | — | — |
standard-library/exception Version ^1.0.38 | — | — |
standard-library/foundation Version ^1.0.38 | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.