The package includes a README, tests, no install-time scripts, and a matching source repository with an MIT declaration. Its missing security policy and zero-star repository provide little additional assurance for a long-lived dependency.
42%
Total Score
63
75
There has been only one release, published nearly ten years ago, with no releases in the last twelve months. This is strong evidence of abandonment risk despite the repository not being archived.
The repository has zero stars, forks, and watchers. Popularity is only supporting evidence, but this provides no external adoption signal to offset the lack of recent releases.
Composer build tooling is present, but no security scanning tools were detected. This is a hygiene gap rather than proof of unsafe code, and it matters more because maintenance evidence is weak.
The linked repository is not archived, which is a positive counterpoint to the very old release history. However, its last push was also nearly ten years ago, so this does not establish active maintenance.
The repository has no security policy, leaving no documented process for reporting or handling vulnerabilities. This adds transparency risk for a package with no recent maintenance evidence.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
No direct dependencies.
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.