Package Health

ssmiff/entabula

It includes tests, a clear README, a matching repository, and a small dependency set. The workflow uses read-only permissions but its two actions are unpinned, and there is no security policy; the project is also too new to show maintenance history.

Latest v1.0.0PackagistPackagist

67%

Total Score

Maintainer Stability
Maintainer Stability
Assesses the consistency and reliability of package maintainers

100

Dependencies
Dependencies
Evaluates the health and security of package dependencies

100

Maturity
Maturity
Indicates package age, release frequency, and adoption metrics

88

Supply Chain
Supply Chain
Evaluates supply chain security practices and risks

50

Health Score Breakdown

Release historycaution

This is the first release, published today, so there is no release cadence or history demonstrating sustained maintenance. Its newness limits confidence rather than proving abandonment.

Repo toolingcaution

Composer build tooling is present, but no security-scanning tool was detected. That is a hygiene gap for a package intended to serve an admin panel.

Security policycaution

The repository has no security policy, leaving no documented channel or process for reporting vulnerabilities. This is a transparency gap, not evidence of a vulnerability.

Workflow auditcaution

The workflow is fully analyzed, uses read-only permissions, and has no dangerous audit findings. However, both action references are unpinned, which weakens build reproducibility and supply-chain hygiene.

Vulnerabilities

We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.

Package versions

Maintainers

No maintainer information available.

Direct Dependencies

DependencyLast ReleaseScore
brick/money
Version ^0.10
—
—

Weekly Downloads

Info

Last Published
6 hours ago
Created
6 hours ago

Are You Affected?

Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.

Free. No credit card required.

Aikido Platform