Clear licensing, tests, documentation, and a matching organization repository improve transparency. The narrow dependency footprint and lack of install-time scripts also reduce adoption friction, but ongoing maintenance remains the main concern.
40%
Total Score
50
100
78
75
The latest release was published nearly 10 years ago, with no releases in the last 12 months and only two releases overall. This is strong evidence of abandonment for a library dependency.
There were no commits and no active maintainers in the last three months, while the repository was last pushed over 9 years ago. This materially increases the risk that defects and compatibility problems will go unaddressed.
The repository has zero stars and forks and one watcher. Popularity is only supporting evidence, but these counters provide no meaningful external adoption signal to offset the inactivity.
Composer build tooling is present, but no security scanning tools were detected. This is a modest transparency and maintenance gap, not a standalone reason to reject the package.
The repository has no security policy. For a small library this is a hygiene gap, but it is less significant than the long-maintenance gap.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
src-run/augustus-exception-library Version ~0.7 | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.