Clear tests, release notes, and a matching repository improve confidence. The 0.x version, infrequent releases, absent security policy, and two unpinned workflow actions leave modest maintenance and hygiene reservations.
82%
Total Score
100
79
75
The package has four releases over about two and a half years, with two releases in the last 12 months and a median interval of about nine months. This is deliberate but slow, so it is a modest maintenance concern.
Composer build tooling is present, but no security-scanning tooling was detected. The missing scanning is a modest process gap, not evidence that the package is unsafe.
The repository has no security policy, leaving no documented process for reporting or handling vulnerabilities. This lowers transparency but does not by itself indicate abandonment.
Version 0.1.3 is not a prerelease, but the package remains below 1.0, indicating a less mature compatibility promise. That is a caveat rather than a severe adoption risk.
The single workflow was fully analyzed with no injection or high-severity findings, and it has no top-level write permissions. Two of four action references are unpinned, which creates a minor reproducibility and workflow-integrity gap.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
No maintainer information available.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
spryker/log Version ^3.0.0 | — | — |
spryker/queue Version ^1.25.0 | — | — |
spryker/kernel Version ^3.73.0 | — | — |
spryker/symfony Version ^3.0.0 | — | — |
spryker/testify Version ^3.0.0 | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.