Healthy and suitable to depend on. It has eight years of releases, twelve releases in the last year, recent activity from six contributors, and complete package tests and documentation; the main caveats are limited repository security hygiene and unspecified workflow token permissions.
90%
Total Score
100
100
94
80
Composer build tooling is present, but no security-scanning tools were detected. This is a hygiene gap, though it is not evidence of abandonment by itself.
The repository has no security policy, leaving vulnerability-reporting expectations unclear. This lowers transparency but is not a severe dependency-health risk on its own.
The one workflow does not declare top-level token permissions. No write permissions were observed, but the unspecified default is weaker workflow hygiene.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
No maintainer information available.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
spryker/kernel Version ^3.30.0 | — | — |
spryker/session Version ^3.2.0 || ^4.0.0 | — | — |
spryker/symfony Version ^3.0.0 | — | — |
spryker/customer Version ^7.82.0 | — | — |
spryker/transfer Version ^3.42.0 | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.