Healthy and suitable to use. It has a long release history, frequent recent releases, active contributors, tests, and clear repository backing; the main caveats are missing security-policy and explicit workflow token-permission declarations.
88%
Total Score
100
100
89
80
The repository has 0 stars and 1 fork, which offers little community-adoption evidence. This is only a supporting weakness because active releases, organization backing, and distributed recent contributions provide stronger maintenance evidence.
Composer build tooling is present, but no security-scanning tool was detected. The missing scanning layer is a transparency and process gap, though it is not evidence that the package is unsafe.
The repository has no security policy file. That leaves vulnerability-reporting and response expectations unclear, creating a modest transparency gap.
The single analyzed workflow does not declare top-level token permissions. No write permissions were observed, but explicit least-privilege configuration would provide stronger workflow hygiene.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
No maintainer information available.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
spryker/cms Version ^7.21.0 | — | — |
spryker/gui Version ^3.48.0 || ^4.0.0 || ^5.5.0 | — | — |
spryker/url Version ^3.5.0 | — | — |
spryker/twig Version ^3.0.0 | — | — |
spryker/kernel Version ^3.52.0 | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.