The README, changelog, and release notes provide enough guidance for adoption. The organization-backed project has a broad active contributor base; workflow pinning and missing security documentation are the main remaining limitations.
84%
Total Score
100
93
75
Composer build tooling is present, but no security-scanning tools were detected. That weakens automated assurance somewhat, though it does not by itself indicate abandonment or unsafe behavior.
The repository has no security policy, leaving vulnerability-reporting expectations and response guidance undocumented. This is a transparency gap, but active maintenance and organization backing partly reduce its practical impact.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
No maintainer information available.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
spryker/cms Version ^6.4.0 || ^7.0.0 | — | — |
spryker/kernel Version ^3.52.0 | — | — |
spryker/locale Version ^3.8.0 || ^4.0.0 | — | — |
spryker/symfony Version ^3.5.0 | — | — |
spryker/customer Version ^7.4.0 | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.