The package is licensed, documented, non-deprecated, and backed by an active organization. Unpinned workflow actions and no security policy or scanning add maintenance hygiene risk.
68%
Total Score
67
100
88
75
The manifest declares a proprietary license, and both the package and repository contain a LICENSE file. The release is therefore licensed, though its proprietary terms may restrict use compared with a permissive open-source license.
One contributor made all 4 commits in the last 3 months, creating a narrow active contributor base. Organization backing provides some handoff capacity, but no second active contributor is shown.
The repository received 4 commits in the last 3 months, showing recent activity, but that activity is limited in volume and concentrated in one maintainer.
Composer build tooling is present, but no security scanning tools were detected. That is a maintenance and assurance gap, though it is not evidence that the package is unsafe.
The repository has no published security policy. This weakens vulnerability-reporting transparency for a package that handles ratings and reviews.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
No maintainer information available.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
spryker/product-review Version ^2.15.0 | — | — |
spryker/product-review-gui Version ^1.8.0 | — | — |
spryker/product-review-search Version ^1.15.0 | — | — |
spryker/product-review-storage Version ^1.9.0 | — | — |
spryker-shop/product-review-widget Version ^1.20.0 | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.