The package has a long release history, regular recent releases, a stable version, and an organization-backed repository. Its small active contributor base, absent security policy, and unpinned workflow actions leave maintenance and build-integrity concerns.
66%
Total Score
67
100
94
67
One contributor made 100% of the last three months' commits. Organization ownership provides some handoff capacity, but no second active contributor is shown to share the current maintenance load.
Only 4 commits were recorded in the last 3 months, all from one active maintainer. Recent work exists, but the concentrated activity leaves limited evidence of independent maintenance capacity.
Composer build tooling is present, but no security-scanning tools were detected. This is a transparency and build-assurance gap, not evidence of malicious behavior.
The repository has no security policy. For a customer-account and OAuth-related feature, the missing reporting and response guidance is a meaningful maintenance and transparency gap.
The sole workflow was fully analyzed with no dangerous triggers, untrusted checkouts, script injections, or audit findings. However, all 4 action references are unpinned, reducing build reproducibility and supply-chain assurance.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
No maintainer information available.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
spryker/oauth Version ^2.13.0 | — | — |
spryker/customer Version ^7.83.0 | — | — |
spryker/oauth-revoke Version ^1.4.0 | — | — |
spryker/customer-note Version ^1.2.0 | — | — |
spryker/customer-group Version ^2.11.0 | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.