The README, release notes, and package identity are clear for consumers. Organization backing and recent releases reduce abandonment risk, but maintenance is concentrated and workflow references are unpinned.
78%
Total Score
83
94
50
All three recent commits came from one contributor, the release bot, so direct maintenance capacity is concentrated. Organization backing provides some compensation but does not remove the continuity concern.
Composer build tooling is present, but no security-scanning tools were detected. This is a modest transparency and supply-chain hygiene gap.
The repository has no published security policy, leaving vulnerability reporting and response expectations undocumented.
The sole workflow was fully analyzed with no injection or high-severity findings, but all four action references are unpinned. The absence of a top-level permissions block is acceptable on its own.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
No maintainer information available.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
spryker/customer-access Version ^1.5.0 | — | — |
spryker/customer-access-gui Version ^1.1.0 | — | — |
spryker/customer-access-storage Version ^1.13.0 | — | — |
spryker/customer-access-permission Version ^1.2.0 | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.