The package has a clear installation path and documented release notes. Organization backing and recent publishing help, but maintenance continuity and workflow hygiene deserve attention before a long-term dependency.
70%
Total Score
67
94
50
All 2 recent commits came from one contributor, the release bot, leaving no observed human contributor diversity in the latest 3-month window. Organization backing helps with handoff potential, but no second active contributor is shown.
Only 2 commits were recorded in the last 3 months, indicating limited recent development activity. This is partly offset by the recent release, but it still suggests modest maintenance capacity.
Composer is used for builds, but no security scanning tool was detected. This is a transparency and maintenance-process gap rather than evidence of an unsafe release.
The repository has no published security policy, leaving vulnerability reporting and response expectations unclear. Other signals show active organizational ownership, which partly reduces the concern but does not remove the gap.
The single workflow was fully analyzed with no dangerous triggers or audit findings, but all 4 action references are unpinned. That weakens build reproducibility and supply-chain hygiene without showing an active exploit path.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
No maintainer information available.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
spryker/acl Version ^3.27.0 | — | — |
spryker/acl-entity Version ^1.17.0 | — | — |
spryker/acl-data-import Version ^0.1.0 | — | — |
spryker/acl-entity-data-import Version ^0.2.0 | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.