Documentation, tests, and release notes make integration clear, while recent commits show active development. The small public contributor base and missing security policy leave maintenance continuity and disclosure practices less certain.
68%
Total Score
83
100
94
75
All 89 recent commits came from one contributor. Organization ownership provides some handoff capacity, but no second active contributor is evidenced, leaving continuity dependent on one person.
The repository has only 2 stars and no forks, offering little independent adoption evidence; this is supporting context rather than a maintenance verdict.
The repository has no security policy, so vulnerability reporting and disclosure expectations are less transparent for consumers.
Both workflows were analyzed without failures, but all 13 action references are unpinned and the release workflow has top-level write permissions. A low-confidence cache-poisoning finding is hygiene evidence rather than a severe conclusion on its own.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
psr/log Version ^3.0 | — | — |
grpc/grpc Version ^1.74 | — | — |
nyholm/psr7 Version ^1.8 | — | — |
google/protobuf Version ^4.33.6 | — | — |
psr/http-client Version ^1.0 | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.