splashfrog/leap-starter

Maintainerscaution

Only one registry account has publish access. This is a limited publishing base, and the individual ownership context provides less redundancy if that maintainer becomes inactive.

Package scaffoldingcaution

A substantial README and repository-backed GitHub Releases provide useful documentation and release visibility, compensating for the absence of packaged tests and a changelog for this starter/scaffolding package. The lack of tests still limits verification, but it is not severe enough to outweigh the available documentation and release evidence.

Project backingcaution

The repository owner is a User rather than an organization, so the project has no demonstrated organizational backing in the collected evidence. Combined with the single registry maintainer, this increases continuity risk.

Repo commit activitycaution

The repository recorded 0 commits and 0 active maintainers over the last 3 months, indicating a recent collapse in observed development activity. The recent push and release history partially compensate, but this remains the strongest abandonment concern in the collected signals.

Repo issue activitycaution

There are no open issues or pull requests and no issue or pull-request activity in the last month. This may reflect a small or quiet project, but it provides little evidence of community review or maintenance responsiveness.