The repository has tests, a clear README, release notes, and MIT licensing, while the organization backing provides some continuity. Security scanning is absent, workflow actions are all unpinned, and the project has no recent issue or commit activity.
55%
Total Score
50
75
50
There were no commits and no active maintainers in the last three months. Combined with the last release being about four years ago, this materially raises abandonment risk.
The latest registry release was about four years ago, with no releases in the last 12 months. This indicates a substantial maintenance gap, although the package has an established release history.
One issue and one pull request remain open, with no issues or pull requests created or closed in the last month. This supports the broader evidence of limited current maintenance.
The repository has 1 star and 2 forks, indicating a small user base. Low popularity is only supporting evidence and is partly offset by the organization-owned project.
The project uses Composer, but no security scanning tools were detected. That is a real supply-chain hygiene gap, though it does not by itself show unsafe code.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
No maintainer information available.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
spiral/helpers Version ^1.0 | — | — |
spiral/framework Version ^2.9 | — | — |
spiral/cycle-bridge Version ^1.0 | — | — |
doctrine/collections Version ^1.6 | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.