Package Health

spiral/models

MIT licensing, a small dependency set, repository tests, and Psalm scanning support straightforward adoption. Maintenance is concentrated in one contributor, and both workflow action references are unpinned; the organization backing and recent releases reduce that concern.

Latest 3.17.2PackagistPackagist

78%

Total Score

Maintainer Stability
Maintainer Stability
Assesses the consistency and reliability of package maintainers

83

Dependencies
Dependencies
Evaluates the health and security of package dependencies

100

Maturity
Maturity
Indicates package age, release frequency, and adoption metrics

100

Supply Chain
Supply Chain
Evaluates supply chain security practices and risks

67

Health Score Breakdown

Repo bus factorcaution

All 7 recent commits came from one contributor, leaving maintenance dependent on a single active individual. Organization backing partly compensates by providing potential handoff capacity.

Security policycaution

The repository has no security policy, which leaves vulnerability-reporting expectations less transparent for consumers.

Workflow auditcaution

Both workflows were analyzed cleanly with no untrusted checkouts, script injection, or audit findings. However, both of the two action references are unpinned, which is a supply-chain hygiene caution.

Vulnerabilities

We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.

Package versions

Maintainers

Anton Titov (wolfy-j)
Pavel Butchnev (butschster)
Aleksei Gagarin (roxblnfk)
Maksim Smakouz (msmakouz)

Direct Dependencies

No direct dependencies.

Weekly Downloads

Info

Last Published
1 month ago
Created
9 years ago

Are You Affected?

Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.

Free. No credit card required.

Aikido Platform