Its MIT licensing, organization backing, and release notes make the package easy to evaluate. Maintenance evidence is limited, with only one release and no commits in the last three months; workflow references also need tighter pinning.
67%
Total Score
75
93
75
This is the package's only release, published about 11 months ago, so there is little release history from which to judge sustained maintenance.
The repository recorded no commits from active maintainers in the last three months, weakening evidence of ongoing maintenance.
The repository has no security policy, leaving vulnerability-reporting expectations undocumented; this is a modest transparency gap for a dependency.
All seven analyzed action references are unpinned, which weakens build reproducibility. One workflow has a pull_request_target trigger and top-level write permissions, but the audit found no untrusted checkout or script-injection sink, so this remains a hygiene concern rather than a severe workflow risk.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
No maintainer information available.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
craftcms/cms Version ^5.0.0 | — | — |
spatie/mailcoach-mailer Version ^1.3.0 | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.