The MIT license, API documentation, and small dependency surface make integration straightforward. A single publisher and no automated security tooling reduce confidence in long-term support.
72%
Total Score
50
100
89
83
Only one registry account has publishing access. The repository is user-owned rather than organization-backed, so this leaves a meaningful bus-factor concern despite the recent release.
There were zero commits and zero active maintainers in the last three months. This is partly offset by the November 2025 release, but it leaves current maintenance activity unclear.
The repository has zero stars and forks and one watcher. Popularity is only supporting evidence, but these counts provide little external evidence of broad adoption or review.
Composer is used for the build, which fits the package ecosystem, but no security-scanning tools are configured. The missing scanning is a modest transparency and maintenance gap.
The repository has no security policy. For an OAuth2 server, the absence of a documented vulnerability-reporting process is a genuine support and transparency concern.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
smartfactory/smartfactory Version >=2.1.25 | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.