Tests, documentation, a BSD-3-Clause license, and no install scripts provide a solid package baseline. The repository has very little activity and does not clearly identify the package in its README, while security-policy and scanning coverage are absent.
45%
Total Score
50
75
75
The package has had only two releases, both in June 2017, and no release in roughly nine years. This is strong evidence of abandonment risk for a dependency.
There were no commits or active maintainers in the last three months. Combined with the old release history, this materially increases abandonment risk.
There are two open issues and no issue or pull-request activity in the last month, indicating no current maintenance response.
The repository name does not exactly match the package name and its README does not mention silverstripe/dms-cart. The repository content appears related, but the missing explicit reference reduces provenance clarity.
Composer build tooling is present, but no security-scanning tools are reported. This is a maintenance and transparency gap, though not severe on its own.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
No maintainer information available.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
silverstripe/dms Version ^2.0 | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.