The repository is backed by an organisation, includes tests, and publishes release notes. Recent commit activity is absent, workflow references are unpinned, and no security policy is provided.
68%
Total Score
67
83
50
The package has existed since 2015 with 23 releases, but it had no releases in the last 12 months. That suggests slowing maintenance, although the long history provides some maturity.
The repository had no commits and no active maintainers in the last three months. This is the clearest maintenance concern, though the recent push and established project backing partly offset it.
There are no open issues or pull requests and no issue or pull-request activity in the last month. This is consistent with a quiet project but does not by itself show abandonment.
Composer build tooling is present, but no security scanning tools were detected. The missing scanning is a hygiene gap rather than evidence that the package is unsafe.
The repository has no security policy. That reduces transparency around vulnerability reporting, but the gap is moderate because the package is organisation-backed and otherwise documented.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
silverstripe/comments Version ^4 | — | — |
silverstripe/framework Version ^5 | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.