It has a clear MIT declaration, a readable four-file artifact, and no install-time scripts. The repository is tiny and has no security scanning or policy, leaving little evidence of ongoing stewardship.
38%
Total Score
67
75
The latest release was published about 11 years ago, with no releases in the last 12 months and only three releases overall. This is strong evidence of abandonment risk despite the package not being deprecated.
The repository name does not match the package name and its README does not mention the package. That weakens confidence that the linked repository is the genuine project source.
The repository has only 1 star, 0 forks, and 1 watcher. Popularity is supporting evidence rather than a verdict, but these figures provide little evidence of a wider maintenance community.
The repository is not archived, which is a positive sign, but it was last pushed about 11 years ago. The lack of recent source activity still weighs against relying on the package.
The repository has no security policy. For a small, inactive package this leaves vulnerability-reporting and response practices unclear.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
No maintainer information available.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
pimple/pimple Version >=3.0 | — | — |
symfony/console Version ~2.3 | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.