The package includes a full test suite, a declared MIT license, and three stable releases over four months. The source project has no security scanning or policy, and its repository does not clearly mention the package, increasing transparency concerns.
58%
Total Score
50
100
83
83
One registry maintainer account is consistent with a small user-owned project, but it provides limited redundancy if that maintainer becomes inactive.
There were no commits and no active maintainers in the last three months, a meaningful warning that maintenance may have stalled after the latest release.
The repository name does not match the package name, and no README package mention was found. That makes the package-to-source relationship less clear, despite the similar Shelfwood naming.
The repository has zero stars, forks, and watchers. This is only supporting evidence, but it offers no external adoption signal to offset the thin maintenance record.
Composer build tooling is present, but no security scanning tools were detected, leaving a modest quality and vulnerability-monitoring gap.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
illuminate/http Version ^11.0|^12.0 | — | — |
illuminate/routing Version ^11.0|^12.0 | — | — |
illuminate/support Version ^11.0|^12.0 | — | — |
illuminate/filesystem Version ^11.0|^12.0 | — | — |
shelfwood/settings-yaml Version ^1.0 | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.