Clear documentation, tests, release notes, and a matching README make adoption straightforward. Licensing and dependency setup are clear; the remaining concern is limited recent activity.
78%
Total Score
75
100
94
83
All recent commits came from one contributor, creating concentrated maintenance responsibility. Organization ownership partly offsets the risk but does not remove the limited recent activity evidence.
There was one commit in the last three months, showing some recent activity but a low maintenance rate. This limits evidence of rapid issue response or active development.
Composer build tooling is present, but no security scanning tools were detected. This is a modest transparency and maintenance-hygiene gap, not evidence that the package is unsafe.
The repository has no security policy, leaving vulnerability-reporting expectations unclear. This is a minor transparency gap for a package handling signing-service credentials and PDF signatures.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
psr/http-client Version ^1.0 | — | — |
psr/http-factory Version ^1.0 | — | — |
setasign/setapdf-signer Version ^2.47 | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.