The small codebase includes tests and a clear LGPL-3.0 license, with only one runtime dependency. Its simple structure limits complexity, but the consumer documentation is extremely brief.
58%
Total Score
75
100
81
88
The package has only one release, published about two years ago, with no releases in the last 12 months. This limits evidence of sustained maintenance.
The repository recorded zero commits and zero active maintainers in the last three months. Combined with the single-release history, this is evidence of stalled maintenance.
The repository name does not match the package name and its README does not mention the package. That raises uncertainty about whether the repository is the intended source, even though the package file tree is consistent with it.
Composer is used as the build tool, but no security scanning tool was detected. The missing scanner is a hygiene gap rather than evidence that the package is unsafe.
The repository has no security policy. For a small library this is a transparency gap, though it does not by itself indicate abandonment.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
No direct dependencies.
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.