secondnetwork/kompass

Maintainerscaution

Only one account has registry publish access. Because this is a user-owned repository rather than organization-backed project, the narrow publishing base is a real continuity concern, although registry access records do not establish who actively maintains the code.

Package scaffoldingcaution

A substantial README is present and the repository uses GitHub Releases, but neither the artifact nor repository contains tests or a changelog. This is a genuine maintenance and transparency gap for a feature-rich Laravel package, though it is not severe enough to indicate abandonment.

Project backingcaution

The repository owner is a User account, not an organization, so there is no organizational backing shown by this signal. This makes the single-contributor and single-publisher findings more consequential.

Repo bus factorcaution

All 73 commits in the last 3 months came from one contributor, giving the project a high bus-factor risk because the repository owner is a user rather than an organization. The active commit volume is encouraging but does not remove this continuity concern.

Repo popularitycaution

The repository has 10 stars, zero forks, and one watcher. This is modest adoption evidence, but popularity is supporting evidence and does not outweigh the strong release and commit activity.