scedel/schema
Documentation, tests, licensing, and read-only workflow permissions make the project transparent to adopt. Maintenance is still thin, with no commits in three months, while both workflow actions are unpinned and no security policy is present.
61%
Total Score
75
83
50
Health Score Breakdown
The package has only two releases, both published on the same day, with no later release across about seven months of package age. That limited history makes long-term maintenance uncertain.
There were no commits or active maintainers in the last three months, and the repository was last pushed about seven months ago. For a young package, this is a meaningful maintenance concern.
The repository has no security policy. This does not show a security defect, but it leaves vulnerability-reporting expectations undocumented.
Version 0.2.1 is not a stable-major release, so the public API may still change. It is not marked as a prerelease, which partly offsets the concern.
The workflow audit completed cleanly and found no dangerous triggers, untrusted checkouts, injection findings, or write-wide tokens; its read-only permissions are positive. However, both analyzed action references are unpinned, leaving avoidable build reproducibility and action-update risk.
Vulnerabilities
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
Package versions
Maintainers
 Scedel contributors |
Direct Dependencies
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
 scedel/parser Version * | — | — |
Weekly Downloads
Info
- Last Published
- 7 months ago
- Created
- 7 months ago
Are You Affected?
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.
I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001CompliantISO 42001Compliant
FedRAMPImplementing© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.