The small, single-owner project has no security policy or security scanning, which limits confidence in ongoing maintenance. Its clear README, minimal dependencies, license, and matching repository make adoption practical despite the aging release.
55%
Total Score
50
100
75
75
Only one release exists, published nearly three years ago, with no releases in the last 12 months. This is meaningful evidence of limited ongoing maintenance, although a small stable library may need few releases.
There were no commits and no active maintainers in the last three months. Together with the old latest release, this leaves little evidence of current maintenance capacity.
Composer build tooling is present, but no security-scanning tooling was detected. For a library that creates certificates and handles key material, this is a modest transparency and maintenance gap.
The repository is not archived, but it was last pushed nearly three years ago. That avoids an abandonment verdict while still indicating stale source activity.
The repository has no security policy. That makes vulnerability reporting and response expectations unclear, though it is not by itself evidence that the package is unsafe.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
No direct dependencies.
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.