Package Health/s3ctrum/composer-example-package

s3ctrum/composer-example-package

The package has a minimal footprint, one runtime dependency, and no install-time scripts, limiting integration risk. The explicit BSD-3-Clause license is a positive, but the small project provides little documentation or security process.

Latest 2.0.0

Packagist

32%

Total Score

Maintainer Stability

Maturity

Supply Chain

Health Score Breakdown

Release history

All four releases were published on 2 April 2019, within minutes of one another, and there have been no releases in roughly seven years. This strongly suggests the package is no longer maintained.

Repo commit activity

There were zero commits and zero active maintainers in the last three months, consistent with the repository having been inactive since April 2019. This is strong abandonment evidence.

Repo package mention

The linked repository name does not match the package name, and no README mention was found. That raises uncertainty about whether the repository is the package's actual source.

Package scaffolding

The artifact has no README, tests, or changelog, although missing tests and changelogs are normal for published artifacts. The missing README is a minor consumer-documentation gap for a package described as an example project.

Project backing

The package and repository are owned by the same individual account, which supports ownership continuity but does not provide organizational backing or compensate for the lack of activity.