Package Health

rubix/sentiment

The project has clear documentation, tests, an MIT license, and organization backing. It lacks a security policy, so maintenance transparency is weaker than its packaging quality suggests.

Latest v8PackagistPackagist

61%

Total Score

Maintainer Stability
Maintainer Stability
Assesses the consistency and reliability of package maintainers

75

Dependencies
Dependencies
Evaluates the health and security of package dependencies

100

Maturity
Maturity
Indicates package age, release frequency, and adoption metrics

89

Supply Chain
Supply Chain
Evaluates supply chain security practices and risks

75

Health Score Breakdown

Release historycaution

The latest registry release was in March 2023, about 3 years and 6 months ago, with no releases in the last 12 months. Earlier releases were reasonably spaced, but the long current gap raises abandonment risk.

Repo commit activitycaution

There were no commits and no active maintainers in the last 3 months. That indicates currently slow development, despite the repository's recent push metadata.

Repo issue activitycaution

Only three issues are open and there has been no recent issue or pull-request activity. This is a small caution, though the low issue volume is not itself evidence of abandonment.

Repo toolingcaution

Composer build tooling is present, but no security scanning tooling was detected. The missing scanner modestly reduces supply-chain transparency.

Security policycaution

The repository has no security policy, leaving vulnerability reporting and response expectations undocumented.

Vulnerabilities

We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.

Package versions

Maintainers

Andrew DalPino

Direct Dependencies

DependencyLast ReleaseScore
rubix/ml
Version ^2.2

Weekly Downloads

Info

Last Published
3 years ago
Created
6 years ago

Are You Affected?

Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.

Free. No credit card required.

Aikido Platform