royalcms/requests
The tiny README and absent security policy make long-term support harder to assess. MIT licensing and only two runtime dependencies are helpful, but do not offset the maintenance uncertainty.
42%
Total Score
50
64
50
Health Score Breakdown
The artifact includes a README, but it is only 19 characters and the source repository has no tests or changelog. Missing tests and changelog are normal packaging practice; the extremely limited consumer documentation is the material gap.
The package has only three releases, with none in the last 12 months and the latest published in November 2020. This indicates a long-standing maintenance gap.
The repository recorded zero commits and zero active maintainers in the last three months, consistent with the release history and indicating no current maintenance activity.
The repository name does not match the package name and its README does not mention the package, so the source-package relationship is less transparent even though the repository is under the matching organization.
The repository has zero stars and forks and only one watcher. Popularity is supporting evidence rather than a verdict, but these counters provide no meaningful external evidence of adoption or active stewardship.
Vulnerabilities
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
Package versions
Maintainers
 Royal Wang |
Direct Dependencies
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
 composer/ca-bundle Version ^1.0 | — | — |
Weekly Downloads
Info
- Last Published
- 5 years ago
- Created
- 7 years ago
Are You Affected?
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.
I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001CompliantISO 42001Compliant
FedRAMPImplementing© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.