royalcms/map
The package has a minimal README and no security policy, limiting transparency. Its MIT license, small dependency surface, and organization-backed repository provide useful reassurance, but adoption would carry ongoing maintenance risk.
42%
Total Score
50
100
67
50
Health Score Breakdown
This is the sole release, published about seven years ago, with no releases in the last 12 months. That strongly suggests the package is no longer actively maintained.
The repository recorded no commits and no active maintainers in the last three months, reinforcing the long-standing lack of maintenance activity.
The package includes a README, but it is only 14 characters long and provides little guidance for consumers. Missing tests and changelog files are normal for published artifacts and are not concerns here.
The repository name does not match the package name and its README does not mention the package. Although this could be a monorepo subpackage, the ownership link is not clearly documented.
The repository has no security policy, leaving vulnerability-reporting expectations unclear. This is a transparency gap, though it does not by itself show that the package is unsafe.
Vulnerabilities
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
Package versions
Maintainers
 Royal Wang |
Direct Dependencies
No direct dependencies.
Weekly Downloads
Info
- Last Published
- 7 years ago
- Created
- 7 years ago
Are You Affected?
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.
I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001CompliantISO 42001Compliant
FedRAMPImplementing© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.