roslov/location

It has clear licensing, documentation, tests, and no install-time scripts, keeping adoption straightforward. The single maintainer, minimal repository footprint, absent security policy, and lack of security scanning limit confidence in long-term support.

Latest 1.0.0

Packagist

58%

Total Score

Maintainer Stability

Maturity

Supply Chain

Health Score Breakdown

Maintainers

One registry maintainer is consistent with a small personal package, but it provides little redundancy if that maintainer becomes unavailable.

Release history

The package has one release, published about 32 months ago, with no releases in the last 12 months. This is meaningful evidence of limited ongoing maintenance for a dependency.

Repo commit activity

The repository recorded zero commits and zero active maintainers in the last three months, consistent with a project that has not received recent development attention.

Repo popularity

The repository has zero stars and forks and one watcher, indicating very limited external adoption. Popularity is supporting evidence rather than a verdict, but it offers little additional confidence here.

Repo tooling

Composer is used for the build, but no security scanning tools are present. The missing scanning reduces assurance for future changes, while the package's small scope limits the severity of that gap.