Testing, a clear README, and a matching source repository improve confidence. The project is young, with one contributor and unpinned workflow actions, so maintenance and build reproducibility remain concerns.
68%
Total Score
67
100
93
67
The package is only 78 days old and has two releases, both published on the same day. This shows recent activity but provides limited evidence of sustained maintenance.
One contributor made all three recent commits, giving the project a single-person maintenance dependency. The repository is user-owned rather than organization-backed, so there is no provided evidence of a handoff path.
The repository had three commits in the last three months, showing some recent maintenance but not a strong ongoing activity pattern.
The repository has no security policy. This is a transparency and response-process gap, though it is not by itself evidence that the package is unsafe.
The workflow audit completed fully, uses read-only permissions, and found no dangerous triggers or audit findings. However, all three action references are unpinned, leaving build inputs less reproducible.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
nette/di Version ^3.2 | — | — |
symfony/console Version ^7.4 | — | — |
romanpiller/sudoku Version ^1.0.1 | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.