rkr/fsutils

Its MIT license, minimal dependency surface, and straightforward Composer packaging are positives. The very short README and absent security policy provide limited guidance for safely integrating and maintaining this library.

Latest 0.0.6

Packagist

43%

Total Score

Maintainer Stability

Dependencies

100

Maturity

Supply Chain

Health Score Breakdown

Release history

The latest release was over six years ago, with no releases in the last 12 months; this is strong evidence of abandonment risk despite the package having a long history and six releases.

Repo commit activity

There were no commits and no active maintainers in the last three months, consistent with the long release gap and materially increasing abandonment risk.

Package scaffolding

The package includes a README, but it is only 66 characters and offers almost no consumer guidance. The absence of tests and a changelog in the published artifact is normal packaging practice, while no repository tests or changelog provide little additional transparency.

Repo package mention

The repository name does not match the package name and its README does not mention the package, so the link may not clearly establish package ownership or provenance.

Security policy

The repository has no security policy. This is a transparency and maintenance gap, though the small dependency surface and simple package structure limit its weight.