The MIT license, focused dependency set, and matching repository make the package easy to inspect. Its source has tests, but workflow references are all unpinned and no security policy is present.
58%
Total Score
50
100
86
50
The latest release was published nearly four years ago, with no releases in the last 12 months. This is a meaningful maintenance concern for a dependency, despite the package having two stable releases.
The repository recorded no commits and no active maintainers in the last three months. Although the repository is not archived, this leaves recent maintenance capacity unproven.
The repository has only 2 stars, 0 forks, and 1 watcher. This is weak supporting evidence for maturity, though low popularity is not decisive for a small specialised helper.
The linked repository has no security policy. That reduces transparency for reporting and handling vulnerabilities, especially when the package is used in applications.
All 5 analyzed action references are unpinned, creating avoidable build reproducibility and action-supply-chain exposure. The audit found no dangerous triggers, untrusted checkouts, script injection, or high-severity findings.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
riclep/laravel-storyblok Version ^2.14 | — | — |
mundschenk-at/php-typography Version ^6.6 | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.