The README, tests, MIT licensing, and release notes make integration and ownership clear. Workflow references are not pinned, and the repository has no security scanning or policy, so CI hygiene is weaker than the maintenance picture.
82%
Total Score
100
94
67
Composer build tooling is present, but no security-scanning tool was detected. This weakens automated assurance, though it does not by itself indicate abandonment.
The repository has no security policy. That reduces transparency about vulnerability reporting and response, but the active organization-owned project provides some compensating maintenance context.
All 15 action references are unpinned, which weakens build reproducibility, and a high-confidence unsound condition was found in documentation workflow; the two low-confidence cache findings are hygiene concerns only. Workflows were fully analyzed and had no untrusted checkouts or script injection.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
psr/log Version ^1|^2|^3 | — | — |
psr/cache Version ^1.0 || ^2.0 || ^3.0 | — | — |
symfony/cache Version >=v3.1.0 | — | — |
liip/serializer Version 2.2.* || 2.6.* | — | — |
psr/http-client Version ^1.0 | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.