Documentation and packaging are adequate, with a recent release and active repository. The project still has a single active contributor, no security policy, and a repository that does not clearly identify this package; verify ownership and maintenance before relying on it heavily.
62%
Total Score
75
81
75
All two recent commits came from one contributor. Organization backing provides some handoff capacity, but no second active contributor is shown to share current maintenance.
The repository received two commits in the last three months, showing recent activity but a very low maintenance cadence.
The repository name does not match the package name and its README does not mention the package, so the link does not clearly establish that this repository is the intended source.
Composer build tooling is present, but no security scanning tooling was detected, leaving security hygiene less independently checked.
The repository has no security policy, so it does not document how vulnerability reports are handled.
We didn't find any vulnerabilities for this package.
No maintainer information available.
| Dependency | Last Release | Score |
|---|---|---|
guzzlehttp/guzzle Version ^7.7 | — | — |
laminas/laminas-stdlib Version ^3.17 | — | — |
Connect your repositories to instantly see whether vulnerable or malicious packages exist in your codebase.
Free. No credit card required.

I consent to receiving marketing communications based on Aikido’s Privacy Policy.
SOC 2Compliant
ISO 27001Compliant
ISO 42001Compliant© All Intel data is openly available and commercially licensed.